Subsections

Source Analysis of the Crandall Canyon, Utah, Mine Collapse

Sean R. Ford, Douglas S. Dreger, William R. Walter (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

Introduction

On 6 August 2007 a magnitude 3.9 seismic event was associated with the tragic collapse of a Utah coal mine, which ultimately killed six miners and three rescue workers. The event was recorded on the local network of the University of Utah Seismic Stations (UUSS) and the Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) operated by the USGS. In addition, the NSF Earthscope USAarray stations had recently been installed in the region (www.earthscope.org). These stations provided good coverage (Figure 2.69a) enabling seismic source analysis of the recorded signals, which revealed an unusually shallow depth and anomalous radiation pattern, both contrary to the expectation for a tectonic earthquake.

Figure 2.69: a) Locations of the August 6, 2007 event and 6 of the closest USArray and ANSS stations. b) Source type plot from the method of Hudson et al (1989) shows clear separation of populations of earthquakes, explosions and collapses. The yellow star shows the solution for the August 6, 2007 seismic event. c) Observed seismograms (black) are compared to synthetics (red) for the non-double-couple solution, which is dominated by a horizontal closing crack (b). The maximum displacement ($10^{-7}$ m) of each set of tangential (T), radial (R), and vertical (V) observations is given. (See color version of this figure at the front of the research chapter.)
\begin{figure*}\begin{center}
\epsfig{file=sean08_1_1.ps}\end{center}\end{figure*}

Results

First motion polarities from vertical-component records of the seismic event are down, or dilatational, indicative of an implosional source (Pechmann et al., 2008). Consistent with this observation, the moment tensor inversion of complete, three-component, low-frequency (0.02 to 0.10 Hz) ground displacement recovered a mechanism that also satisfies the observed first motions, and is most consistent with the gravity driven vertical collapse of a horizontally oriented underground cavity at a shallow depth consistent with the mine workings (Figure 2.69b). The total seismic moment of this mechanism was $1.91 \times 10^{15}$ N-m ($M_W4.2$). However, a closing horizontal crack theoretically has no Love wave excitation and in order to explain the large amplitude Love waves observed on the tangential component (Figure 2.69c) the mechanism must contain a secondary non-crack component that is 24% of the dominant vertical collapse moment ( $1.71 \times 10^{15}$ N-m). The secondary source excitation of the moment tensor can be represented in multiple ways, as the moment tensor decomposition is non-unique (Jost et al., 1989). Plausible interpretations of the secondary source include additional vertical dip-slip faulting, horizontal shear, non-uniform crack closure, and elastic relaxation in response to the mine collapse.

The source-type diagram (Hudson et al., 1989) in Figure 2.69b illustrates the deviation from a pure earthquake double-couple (DC) source at the center in terms of a volumetric component (explosion or implosion) on the ordinate, and deviatoric component in terms of a volume compensated linear vector dipole (CLVD) on the abscissa. The moment tensor solution for the 6 August 2007 event plots in the region of a negative or closing crack. The diagram shows that despite the secondary source component the seismic waveforms are best fit by a model that is primarily comprised of a closing horizontal crack, or underground collapse, and is similar to solutions obtained for other mine and Nevada Test Site (NTS) cavity collapses (Ford et al., 2008). In contrast, NTS nuclear explosions modeled with the same method (Ford et al., 2008) plot squarely in the explosion region of the diagram. Both the explosions and collapses are significantly separated from the population of earthquakes, which locate in the center of the diagram. Deviation from pure DC mechanisms in the earthquake population can be a result of several factors including complex faulting, noise, and the effect of approximate Earth structure models on the basis GreenŐs functions for the inversion. Despite the scatter within the three source populations, there is clear separation between each, indicating that regional distance seismic moment tensor methods are capable of source-type discrimination.

Conclusions

Our findings show that the seismic waveforms associated with the mine collapse primarily reflect the collapse; however, the seismic source process was more complex than observed in other collapse events (Pechmann et al., 1995) with a large secondary source generating strong Love waves. This application of seismic moment tensor analysis demonstrates the feasibility of continuous monitoring of regional distance seismic wavefields for source-type identification including nuclear explosion monitoring and given rapid access to the seismic waveform data, for emergency response applications.

Acknowledgements

Sponsored by National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of Nonproliferation Research and Development, Office of Defense, Nuclear Nonproliferation. Contract No. DE FC52-06NA27324. We thank Bruce Julian for the code to make the source-type plots.

References

Ford, S., D. Dreger and W. Walter (2008). Identifying isotropic events using a regional moment tensor inversion, accepted by J. Geophys. Res.

Jost, M. L. and R. B. Herrmann (1989). A student's guide to and review of moment tensors, Seismol. Res. Lett., 60 2, 37-57.

Hudson, J. A., R. G. Pearce, R. G., and R. M. Rogers (1989). Source type plot for inversion of the moment tensor, J. Geophys. Res., 9 (B1), 765-774.

Pechmann, J. C., W. J. Arabasz, K. L. Pankow, R. Burlacu, and M. K. McCarter (2008), Seismological report on the 6 Aug 2007 Crandall Canyon Mine collapse in Utah, Seism Res. Lett., 79 5, 10-12.

Pechmann, J. C., W. R. Walter, S. J. Nava, and W. J. Arabasz (1995). The February 3, 1995, ML 5.1 seismic event in the trona mining district of southwestern Wyoming, Seism. Res. Lett., 66 3, 25-34.

Berkeley Seismological Laboratory
215 McCone Hall, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-4760
Questions or comments? Send e-mail: www@seismo.berkeley.edu
© 2007, The Regents of the University of California