For the last three decades, a rather vigorous debate has been going on about the most fundamental aspects of the style of continental deformation in the India-Eurasia collision zone. While one school of thought envisions Tibet to be a thickened, weak and fluid-like zone (e.g. Cook and Royden, 2008), others consider the tectonics in the region as that of essentially rigid microplates bounded by major lithospheric faults (e.g. Thatcher, 2007). Until this issue is resolved, it will be difficult to gain a clear idea of what forces drive the deformation of the upper crust in this region. Large earthquakes initiate rock mechanics experiments of lithospheric dimensions in which a sudden stress change leads to stress relaxation at depth. Surface measurements of the resulting deformation provide a basis for testing structural and rheological models of the lithosphere.
Our main objective in this project is the elucidation of lithospheric
rheological structure in northern Tibet, chiefly through InSAR
investigation of postseismic motion following three recent major
earthquakes. These events are the 1997
7.6 Manyi earthquake
(Funning et al., 2007; Ryder et al., 2007), the 2001
7.9 Kokoxili earthquake (Lasserre et al., 2005) and the
2008
7.2 Yutian earthquake. By analysing the spatio-temporal
characteristics of the postseismic signals, and testing the data
against various candidate models, we hope to determine whether
deformation in the mid to lower crust is localized or distributed, and
constrain rheological parameters associated with our preferred
model. Our broader objective is to inform the geophysical debate
concerning the nature of the Tibetan Plateau: specifically, whether it
behaves more like a viscous fluid or a series of rigid blocks.
![]() |
We use the satellite geodetic technique of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) to observe postseismic deformation for several years following each of the three major earthquakes. For the Manyi case, we use data from the European Space Agency's (ESA) ERS-2 satellite, and for the Kokoxili case we use radar scenes from ESA's Envisat. The Yutian earthquake occurred after the launch of Japan's L-band ALOS satellite, so we will be able to utilize postseismic data from this as well as the C-band Envisat. Postseismic interferograms for both the Manyi and Kokoxili earthquakes reveal several centimeters of line-of-sight transient displacement in both cases (Figure 2.10). The wavelength of the postseismic signal suggests that relaxation processes occur at a depth of 15-20 km, which is approximately the seismogenic depth in this area. A deformation time series for the Manyi event can be constructed from multiple interferograms, and yields a relaxation time of 0.7 years. It is not possible to make early postseismic interferograms for the Kokoxili case, and so making a time series is difficult, but GPS data from a network of 65 sites either side of the rupture will ultimately give temporal information about the postseismic transient. We are currently waiting for postseismic data for the Yutian earthquake; cosesismic interferograms have been processed, and show clear deformation fringes despite the ice cover in the area. Figure 2.10 shows interferograms for each of the three events.
In order to interpret the observed surface deformation in terms of
sub-surface rheological structure, we implement models of postseimic
stress relaxation in a viscoelastic medium. The idea here is that
stress changes near the fault induced during the earthquake are
relaxed due to viscous flow beneath an elastic upper crust. The
thickness and viscosity of a Maxwell viscoelastic layer are varied in
the models, and we seek parameters which best fit the data. For both
the Manyi and Kokoxili cases, the best-fit viscosity is between
and
Pas; a single thick
viscoelastic layer is preferred, suggesting that the entire mid to
lower crust flows, with no stratification in viscous properties.
A Maxwell viscoelastic medium is the simplest type of linear viscoelastic rheology, and it is reasonable to run initial models using such a rheology. However, the Manyi time series is not fit consistently throughout the entire 3.5 year observation period by a single Maxwell viscosity; rather, the effective viscosity increases over time. Another linear rheology which could produce this effect is a Burgers body, which consists of a Maxwell and a Kelvin element in series. We are currently running further models, varying the transient and steady-state viscosities as well as the ratio of Maxwell and long term shear moduli. Another candidate relaxation mechanism is localized afterslip on an extension of the coseismic rupture plane at depth. The data will also be tested against models simulating this mechanism. For strike-slip earthquakes such as Manyi and Kokoxili, surface deformation due to distributed viscous flow and localized afterslip can look very similar. The postseismic signature of the normal-faulting Yutian earthquake should be particularly useful for distinguishing between mechanisms, since the surface deformation from the two processes looks very different for dip-slip events.
This project is funded by NSF grant number EAR-0738298. All SAR data are from the European Space Agency (ESA), obtained through Category-1 Proposal No. 5119.
Cook K.L. and L.H. Royden, The role of crustal strength variations in shaping orogenic plateaus, with application to Tibet. J. Geophys. Res., 112, doi: 10.1029/2007JB005457, 2008.
Funning, G., B. Parsons and T. Wright, Fault slip in the 1997 Manyi, Tibet earthquake from linear elastic modelling of InSAR displacements, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 988-1008, 2007.
Lasserre, C., G. Peltzer, F. Crampé, Y. Klinger, J. Van der Woerd and P. Tapponnier, Coseismic deformation of the 2001 Mw = 7.8 Kokoxili earthquake in Tibet, measured by synthetic aperture radar interferometry, J. Geophys. Res., 110, B12408, 2005.
Ryder, I., B. Parsons, T. Wright and G. Funning, Post-seismic motion following the 1997 Manyi (Tibet) earthquake: InSAR observations and modelling, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 1009-1027, 2007.
Thatcher, W., Microplate model for the present-day deformation of Tibet, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B01401, 2007.
Berkeley Seismological Laboratory
215 McCone Hall, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-4760
Questions or comments? Send e-mail: www@seismo.berkeley.edu
© 2007, The Regents of the University of California