Click to Visit
November 13, 2005 navbardiscovery.comDiscovery ChannelTLCAnimal PlanetTravel ChannelDiscovery Health ChannelDiscovery Store
Discovery Channel rule
shopping tile
Discovery Channel
free newsletter
site search
Discovery Channel News
Discovery News Brief

send to a friend
printer friendly version
rss headline feed | xml

Quake Devastation in Pakistan
Quake Devastation in Pakistan
First Seconds of Earthquakes Tell All
small text
large text

Nov. 10, 2005 — First impressions may be more reliable than ever when it comes to earthquakes, say seismologists.

A new study shows that contrary to what seismologists have long thought, the first shivers of a quake may actually give away clues to how much overall energy will be released — what's popularly known as the quake's total magnitude.

For years, earthquakes have been thought to work more like a cascading line of dominoes, the first little domino giving no hint about what's going to be toppled further down the line. But if the new finding is confirmed and the first few seconds of a quake can portend the rest of the shaking, it means earthquakes operate quite differently than thought.

It also suggests that earthquakes are the end result of a more subtle, silent slipping process yet to be detected in the Earth's crust.

"The bottom line of the cascade (domino) model is that you can't tell the magnitude of the earthquake until it's over," said geophysicist Richard Allen of the University of California at Berkeley.


Allen and Erik Olson of the University of Wisconsin at Madison published a paper on the matter in the Nov. 10 issue of Nature.

When Olson and Allen studied the seismographs of the first few seconds of 71 earthquakes in California, Alaska, Taiwan and Japan, they began to see evidence that the energy released by the initial seconds of underground ruptures were scaled-down matches to the overall magnitude of the quakes.

That's exactly not what the cascading dominoes model predicts.

"An alternative model is that the small beginning (of a quake) is the last phase of some longer, slower, sub-seismic 'nucleation' process," suggested geophysicist Rachel Abercrombie of Boston University, who wrote a separate article in Nature commenting on Allen's and Olson's work.

That longer, slower process might be the gradual, silent and so far undetected slipping of faults that set the stage for the final quake.

Regardless of the cause, the discovery is good news for earthquake warning systems, said Allen. Even a few seconds of automated warning time can be helpful when a big quake hits, he said.

Although most people may not be able to react fast enough, warning systems in Japan, Taiwan and Mexico are already used to instantly warn planes away from airports (in case runways are being damaged), to sound alarms at schools and to automatically shut down processes at high-tech manufacturers where a lot of damage could be done by shaking. All of these things can save lives.

As for what it means for earthquake studies, the discovery is another constraint that can be added to simulations of how faults work, said Allen.

That's particularly useful because constraints are in short supply to geophysical modelers, he said, who have very little information about exactly what is going on in the rupturing surfaces of faults during a quake.

Get More News:
11 Nov 2005   DNA Method Could Reveal Jack the Ripper
11 Nov 2005   NASA: Shuttle Fixes Well Under Way
11 Nov 2005   Study: Squirrels Have Complex Language
11 Nov 2005   'Godzilla' Dino-Crocodile Found
10 Nov 2005   Infrared Vision Reveals Star Birth
09 Nov 2005   Space Tractor Could Tow Asteroids

news main

Pictures: AP Photo/Lefteris Pitarakis |
Contributers: AFP |

By visiting this site, you agree to the terms and conditions
of our Visitor Agreement. Please read. Privacy Policy.
Copyright 2005 Discovery Communications Inc.

The leading global real-world media and entertainment company.

May We Suggest
shopping banner