Thursday, November 10, 2005
By Robert Roy
Britt
The magnitude of an earthquake
can be roughly predicted as the shaking begins, according to
new research that promises to provide several seconds of
warning before the brunt of a catastrophe strikes.
Earthquake prediction has proved tricky. Scientists can't
pinpoint the timing of a rupture to within days or even months
or years. But the new method provides an accurate glimpse of
what will happen in just a moment.
"We can determine the magnitude within a couple of seconds
of initiation of rupture and predict the ground motion from
seconds to tens of seconds before it's felt," says Richard Allen, a seismologist at the
University of
California, Berkeley.
If an automatic warning system were set up, there might be
time for school children to dive under desks and others to
hunker down in doorways, Allen figures.
Waves come in waves
The prediction is made possible by the fact that a typical
earthquake sends out three different types of waves, which
Allen has been studying for the past few years.
He and colleague Erik
Olson of the University of Wisconsin-Madison examined the
seismic records of 71 large temblors.
(Story continues below)
— Primary waves, or P waves,
come first. They move like a pressure wave, typically creating
a jolt. P waves are the least destructive.
— Next comes a secondary wave, or S wave.
It shears the ground back and forth and up and down.
— Then come surface waves, the most destructive. They jerk
the ground sideways and later roll in like ocean waves.
The frequency of P waves is related to the intensity of the
eventual surface waves, Allen and his colleagues have
determined.
The idea flies in the face of convention, which holds that
a quake's outcome depends on a cascade of unpredictable events
along a fault that occur after an initial eruption.
The new results "imply that the final magnitude of an
earthquake depends at least partially on what happens in its
first few seconds," says Rachel
Abercrombie, an expert in earthquake rupture at Boston University
who was not involved in the study.
While no two earthquakes are alike, San Francisco would
likely get 20 seconds or more of warning for a major temblor,
Allen said.
"It is not a perfect system," Allen told LiveScience.
But he added that all of the large-magnitude earthquakes
his team has studied "do show this characteristic of the first
few seconds" that allow a useful prediction.
"The magnitude estimates in the study are within plus and
minus 1 magnitude unit," explained Allen. "For some events,
the error will be greater than others."
The science behind the idea is detailed in the Nov. 10
issue of the journal Nature.
Getting the word out
Another key to the prediction system is that not everyone
sits atop the spot where an earthquake originates, and the
waves of an earthquake travel much more slowly than the
light-speed communications that could send a warning.
If a rupture occurs at the extreme northern end of the
800-mile San
Andreas fault, for example, the shaking could take 80
seconds, traveling about 2 miles per second, to reach San
Francisco.
Such a far-off event might not destroy the City by the Bay.
But no matter where the epicenter lies, there would be a
window for warning most of the ultimate victims.
"It is more likely than not that there would be greater
than 20 seconds warning for the earthquakes most damaging to
the city of San Francisco," Allen's team states on its Web site.
Allen said at least a year of further testing is needed
before a real warning system could go live.
He envisions using the Internet to transmit information of
a quake. A computer at the other end would interpret the
warning for the specific location and estimate timing and
intensity of the anticipated shaking. There might be multiple
warning methods.
"Cell phone towers could determine the impact of the
earthquake for the area they cover and transmit a warning to
the cell phones within range," Allen said.
Allen is working with the U.S. Geological Survey to
determine how accurate the warnings from his Earthquake Alarm
Systems (ElarmS) would be.
Copyright © 2005 Imaginova Corp. All Rights Reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed. |