Seismo Blog
Below zero: The 'bottom' of the Richter scale
20081205 00:00:00 0800
Categories: magnitude
Many of us still dread our high school days, when the math teacher talked about logarithms. Who understood then and who can remember now the alien concept of grouping numbers not in their natural sequence, but by some funny exponent applied to an arbitrary base. Well, here is a quick refresher on the simplest logarithms, those of base 10. Look at the number 100 and ask how often you have to multiply the number 10, our base, by itself to get 100. The answer is 2  and that is the logarithm of 100. If you look at the number 1000 and ask again how often you have to multiply our base number 10 by itself to get 1000, the answer is 3. Hence the logarithm of 1000 is 3. You therefore can use logarithms to easily deal with really big numbers, as the logarithm of one million is six and the latest bailout figure for Wall Street, 100 billion, is reduced to a mere 11 when you determine its logarithm.
Richter scaled his earthquakes using such a logarithmic method (see blog November 18, 2008). A magnitude 3 earthquake therefore has ten times larger amplitudes than a 2; a magnitude 4 is ten times bigger than a 3 and hence one hundred times bigger than a 2. In Richter's day, the seismograph's recordings were on light sensitive paper, which was illuminated by a light beam artfully reflected from the moving mass of a WoodAnderson seismograph, its mirror. Once the film was developed, the ground movement was represented by a dark line on that paper.
But even with a magnifying glass you were not able to see fine details of the ground movement. As a consequence, with the original Richter scale it was impossible to classify either the really big quakes (see blog December 1, 2008) or the tiniest microtemblors.
With today's electronic seismometers, however, the lower limit of the first Richter scale has been all but eliminated. These instruments are so sensitive that they can register earthquakes a hundred or even a thousand times smaller than an event of magnitude 2. But how do we label such tiny quakes? That is again where the ingenuity of a logarithmic scale comes in. An earthquake ten times smaller than a 2 would have a magnitude of 1; a hundred times smaller would be zero on the logarithmic scale. And if an event is thousand times smaller, its size would be "minus 1" on the Richter scale. And we do indeed measure such nanosized earthquakes regularly, for instance in a borehole, which penetrates the San Andreas Fault deep below Parkfield in Monterey County (see picture). (hra021)
Recent Posts

: Oroville Dam Makes its own Earthquakes

: Today in Earthquake History: San Fernando 1971

: Of Ghost Towns and Explosions

: Temblors where Three Plates Meet

: An Earthquake of Two Flavors

: The Missing Link

: Predicting Presidents and Not Earthquakes

: Falling Like Dominoes

: A Diplomatically Subdued Headline

: Earthquake Hazard in the Midwest

: No Culture of Prevention

: Another Tragedy in the Heart of Italy

: A Stepping Stone to the Pacific Plate

: Hybrid Faults and Earthquake Clusters

: An Icon of Plate Tectonics  Erased for Now
View Posts By Category
 Seismic Sources
 Natural Hazards
 CISN Special Report
 California Seismicity
 Earthquake Science
 earthquake statistics
 Today in Earthquake History
 liquefaction
 plate tectonics
 faults
 Hayward fault
 magnitude
 Earthquake Preparedness
 Global Seismicity
 Instrumentation
 Breakthrough Research
 Seismograms
 Northridge
 CEA
 earthquake insurance
 Tres Pinos
 swarm
 research
 seismic waves
 MOBB
 ocean bottom seismometry
 Owens
 Valley
 Earthquake
 Drill
 Loma Prieta
 1989
 Plate Tectonics
 GPS
 Historic Moments in Seismology
 Historic Earthquakes
 Seismograms'
 earthquake
 Nepal
 Concord
 deep earthquakes
 Hawaii
 Hayward Fault
 San Ramon
 Peru
 Exotic Seismic Sources
 Earthquake Early Warning
 MyShake
 Fault Zone Properties
 Active Tectonics
 Myths
 National Seismicity
 HumanInduced Seismicity
 Nuclear Test
 Italy
 earthquake prediction
 Rodgers Creek Fault
 Cape Mendocino
 San Andreas Fault
 California
 Swarms
 San Fernando 1971
 induced seismicity
 Oroville